| Check-in process |  3.5 / 5 |
|---|---|
| Working order of facilities / equipment |  2.2 / 5 |
| Overall value for money | 2.3 / 5 |
| Performance of staff |  3.0 / 5 |
| Your room |  2.0 / 5 |
| Overall experience |  2.4 / 5 |
| Order and cleanliness of the hotel | 2.4 / 5 |
| Guest Rating | 2.5 / 5 |
2.4 / 5
Anonymous
on 29/11/2009
(Solo business traveller)
friendly check-in
was given the quad room on top floor. the only window had a huge hole and crack which had not been repaired. very tired cast off furniture, carpets curtains. in-room sink only had one faucet working. small t.v had damaged power button, so could only turn on at the wall and no remote.
breakfast in the basement- staff was not dressed appropriately for wait service or hygiene, e.g. cooks had no uniforms, no aprons,no head covering etc. waiter was dressed in street clothes- i had no idea he was part of the staff.must improve in this area.
Overall: dingy (108937321)
1.0 / 5
Anonymous
on 17/11/2009
(Young couple)
none poor
smelly dirty no help in hotel .staff at breakfast was dirty an standard of food was poor ,not clean in the hotel at all overall it was rubbish an needs a good clean ,my shed at home is cleaner
Overall: never (108191615)
4.0 / 5
Anonymous
on 16/11/2009
(Solo business traveller)
wifi in the rooms, warm, clean, hot water in the showers, perfectly fine.
I've had no problems with this hotel. You get what you pay for. Although, don't stay on the ground floor front rooms - there's substantial noise from the road. Stay either at the back, or on a higher floor.
Overall: I like this hotel. In the area, I find it's the best value. Going cheaper than this place leads to problems for me - heat, not enough hot water, wifi is sketchy, that sort of thing. The Langland is reliable in this way. I've stayed there a bunch of times, and at 6-7 other hotels in that neighbourhood, and 4-5 others in London. The Langland is my preferred place to stay for this price level (usually 45-55 pounds a night). (108192652)
2.9 / 5
Ian [Hamilton, GB]
on 06/11/2009
(Mature couple)
Close to amenities. Inexpensive
Faulty TV. Carpets in room could have been cleaner. Shared toilet was a nuisance.
Overall: Worth the money. Sometimes you get what you pay for. (108559570)
1.0 / 5
GREG [ST. HELENS, GB]
on 01/11/2009
(Solo business traveller)
Overall: awful (108304846)
1.3 / 5
Anonymous
on 05/10/2009
(Solo business traveller)
No good points
Very substandard. Won't book here again.
Overall: Poor all round. (108983442)
Our rating system is designed to give you the confidence to find and book the hotel that best suits your needs. We've worked hard to create a fair and impartial process to collect our ratings so you can always be assured of a great hotel experience.
Unlike other sites that offer ratings, our rating process is by invitation only. This ensures that 100% of the ratings you see on our site come from guests that have booked online with us and stayed at the hotel in question.
All our ratings are created by guests who have booked through Active Hotels (or its sister sites) and completed their stay over the last year. We don't edit, alter or adjust the ratings so you can be sure of unbiased opinions.
48 hours after departure from your accommodation booked through Active Hotels or any of our sister sites, you may be invited to complete a guest review questionnaire. This means that, for most hotels, we're able to post more than 1 guest rating every single week. We currently display over 70,000 ratings and we add hundreds of scores from real guests every day.